Winter Butterfly
- 8h 25/2/02
Dear Friends
Wales v Oxford
University
Andrew Hennessy, our International
Organiser, has offered to send a report on this in the near future.
I'll pass it on when I receive it. In the meantime could I draw your
attention to John Saunders' report,
including pictures, on the BCM site. This can be found at:
If you haven't visited the bcm site before,
its well worth going there.
Dyfed Congress
I have received the results from 'our Mid
Wales correspondent', Iolo Jones. Many thanks Iolo.
OPEN SECTION
1st I.C. Jones (Cardigan) 4.5/5
2nd A.H. Williams
(Cardigan) 4/5
3rd = D.Johnston (Carmarthen), S.Evans-Quek (Cardiff)
3.5/5
Grading Prize I. Rees (Caerphilly)
25 players took part
MAJOR
SECTION
1st C. Woolcock (W.C.U.) 5/5
2nd= G.C. Link (Church Stretton),
R.N.Allen (Downend and Fishpond) 4/5
Grading Prize B. Hughes (Penarth)
30
players took part.
MINOR SECTION
1st= H.Leah (Cardigan),D.Cubitt
(Wandering Dragons) 4.5/5
3rd= N.Inskip (Newcastle Emlyn), M. Moore (Nidum),
Canon I.L.Davies (Church Stretton) 3.5/5
Grading Prize T.Barlow
(Cardigan)
20 players took part.
Despite the numbers being well down
on Gwbert last year, the players indicated that they had enjoyed the new
surroundings, with more spacious playing conditions, good accommodation at the
hotel and excellent food as well. Indeed, those who arrived early on the Friday
night had tea and scones at 4 p.m., and "cawl" as well as sandwiches at 6 p.m.,
all at no extra expense!!
From the President.
In edition 8g I said that I thought things
were at last looking up in Wales and the WCU was becoming more proactive.
The following email from Kevin Staveley couldn't have been more
timely:
Dai,
I'm in the middle of writing a development plan for
the WCU. It will be discussed at he next management board meeting on 17th March.
Following that (assuming I get the go ahead) I'll circulate it at the AGM, in
the next newsletter and also pass a copy to you to circulate in "Winter
Butterfly"
Keep in touch.
Kevin
A separate email from him (received 25
Feb)contained the following.
...Copies of newsletters were sent to all secretaries last
week. All members should have a copy by the end of this week. If not - nag their
secretary.
25th TRW CAM GEARS Neath & District Junior Chess Championships
Many thanks to Peter Bevan for sending me a copy of Martyn's letter regarding
this event. Its attached as a .gif file which I hope everybody should be
able to access, unless you receive this ezine via your tv set. If is can't
open it and you want a copy, I suggest you contact Martyn Griffiths, 15
Brookside, Neath Abbey. SA10 7AG. Tel 01639-636332.
Internet Chess
Good to see that the WCU is getting to grips with internet chess (edition
8g). I had hoped to issue a challenge to Cardiff to play a 4 a side match
against Pontypridd Past and Present. I was going to suggest 10 minute per
player games, but with a slight difference. Each individual played every
member of the opposing team. Not the format the WCU have in mind, they are
looking initially at individual playing 30 minutes a side games. But that
only shows that there are many possibilities opened up by new
technology. I wonder if it will be possible to arrange a evening swiss
tournament using the internet. I'll watch developments with interest.
Of course there are problems with internet chess, not least of which is the
scope for cheating. But I think that we'll just have to accept that some
people will resort to this. Most of us who already play on the internet
are aware of this and accept that it occasionally happens. It annoys
us when we think its happening, but it doesn't stop us playing. The only
suggestions that I would make is maybe the penalties if someone is caught should
be draconian (to reflect their stupidity in being caught) and we could always
have a close look at the games of players who suddenly puts on 300
points.
I know there are some people, including some on the executive, who feel the
whole thing is silly and we shouldn't get involved. I strongly disagree
with them. Internet chess is a fact. Sooner or later Welsh
players will start to compete against each other. In these circumstances
the WCU has a responsibility to become involved (it could be argued that if it
fails to do so then it would be in breach of its own constitution). Those
that don't like it don't have to play, but they have no right to get in the way
of those that want to. Or to put it another way 'Wake up, its the
twenty-first century.'
Use of New Technology
While I'm on the subject of new technology
isn't it about time we used it to do something about the AGM. At the
moment its badly attended and tends to be dominated by players from the
association which is hosting it. If North Wales ever comes into the WCU
then people could be faced with a round trip of 300 odd miles to attend.
This is not satisfactory. We should go for a distributed AGM. Some
companies already do this. My idea is that one of the associations should
host the AGM but rather than needing to travel to it members should be able to
attend centres set up in each of the other associations. Basically, all we
need is a sound link between these using the internet. In an ideal world
we might even consider using a webcam, but that's not essential. We would
have to make appropriate amendments to the constitution and look at the standing
orders and protocols for the AGM, for example how to balance the right of people
in different centres who wish to address the meeting and how the votes are
coordinated. Still, I can't see any difficulties that make this a none
starter.
Now if we were really forward thinking we
might set up a committee to work out the details at the next AGM. Their
proposals could be accepted or amended at the 2003 AGM and the new system
implemented ready for the 2004 AGM.
One last point, how about putting the
minutes of all committee meeting on the WCU website. They could be removed
after a set time. Against the wishes of most committee members, because of
the difficulty of disseminating the information, very few people have access to
this information. Committees make decisions on behalf of the ordinary
members, many of which have financial repercussions. I'm sure they would
want to keep the members informed of what they were doing and this seems one way
of solving the problem.
I would be interested to hear your views on
these points.
Very best wishes
Dai James.
[The attached file in this message has been decoded and saved as C:\PROGRAM FILES\AMEOL2\USERS\ADMIN\ATTACH\CAM.GIF.]